Advertisement
President-elect Donald Trump quickly responded to concerns about Mike Rogers’ rumored appointment as FBI director. His advisor Dan Scavino clarified the situation on social media, saying: “I just spoke to President Trump about Mike Rogers going to the FBI. It’s not happening – in his own words: ‘I never even thought about it. ‘ Not happening.” This announcement effectively suppressed speculation among Trump supporters.
Mike Rogers, a former FBI agent and congressman, became a controversial figure after meeting with Trump’s transition team. Although his experience included chairing the House Intelligence Committee, his background in intelligence raised concerns. Trump’s supporters questioned his suitability for the FBI’s role given his past statements. This criticism gained traction when Rogers’ history came under scrutiny.
In 2017, Rogers publicly stated that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, describing it as a “clear and present danger to our democracy.” These comments resurfaced and alienated Trump’s base, who saw them as divisive. His statements raised doubts about his alignment with Trump’s vision. Supporters feared Rogers would not defend their priorities as FBI director.
Rogers also co-founded The Alliance for Securing Democracy, which some critics have called a “deep state Never Trump” organization. The group’s Hamilton 68 project aimed to identify Russian disinformation accounts but faced backlash for targeting journalists and American citizens. These actions fueled distrust among Trump loyalists. Many saw Rogers as too closely tied to anti-Trump initiatives.
Further controversy arose when former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe endorsed Rogers for the role. McCabe called Rogers a “perfectly reasonable, logical selection” in an interview on CNN. He warned that Trump would choose MAGA loyalist Kash Patel instead. This endorsement deepened opposition to Rogers within Trump’s base. Kash Patel emerged as the favored alternative and offered a completely different vision for the FBI. In a podcast interview, he stated, “I would close the FBI Hoover Building on day one and reopen it the next day as a museum of the deep state.” His bold statements resonated with Trump supporters who were eager to implement sweeping reforms. Patel’s ideas underscored the commitment to realigning the agency.
Patel gained recognition during his work with Devin Nunes, defending Trump against charges of Russian collusion. His loyalty led to key roles in the Trump administration, including as chief deputy to the acting director of the Defense Department. Trump’s base viewed him as a staunch ally in the fight against the “deep state.” This reputation strengthened his appeal as a candidate for the FBI position.
Patel’s strong stance on national security reform further rallied Trump supporters. He proposed redistributing FBI employees across the country to focus on criminal investigations. “You’re police officers. Be police officers,” he said emphatically during the podcast interview. This vision energized the MAGA movement and aligned with their calls for change.
Rogers’ connections to establishment figures, such as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, also came under scrutiny. He had previously praised Clapper’s “professionalism” and “gravitas,” raising concerns among Trump’s allies. These associations deepened skepticism about Rogers’ alignment with Trump’s goals. The backlash highlighted the divide between MAGA supporters and establishment figures.
Trump’s decision to distance himself from Rogers strengthened his alignment with the MAGA movement. His rejection of Rogers as a candidate reflected his commitment to prioritizing loyalty and bold reforms. By putting an end to speculation, Trump strengthened his base’s confidence in his leadership. This move signaled his commitment to reforming the FBI to reflect his vision.
Want more stories like this from the Daily Mail? Visit our profile page and click the follow button above for more news you need.