Trump Criticizes ‘Soros-Funded Radical Democrat Prosecutor’ Alvin Bragg Over Stormy Daniels Case

Donald Trump’s team criticized the New York lawyer seeking to sue him over hush money paid to Stormy Daniels as a “George Soros-funded radical Democrat.”

A spokesman for the former president issued a harsh criticism of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg shortly after Trump said he would be arrested Tuesday.

The spokesperson also noted that Bragg’s office has not notified Trump or his legal team that an arrest is imminent.

A Trump spokesperson said: “There has been no notification, other than illegal leaks from the Department of Justice and the district attorney’s office, to NBC and other fake news outlets, that the radical left-wing Democrat prosecutor funded by George Soros in Manhattan you have decided to take your witch hunt to the next level.

“President Trump is rightly highlighting his innocence and the gunplay of our system of injustice. He will be in Texas next weekend for a giant rally. Make America Great Again!’

During his campaign for the 2021 election, Bragg received the support of a political action committee that received money from George Soros.

Color Of Change PAC, the political action committee of the nation’s largest online racial justice group, has received $1 million from billionaire philanthropist Soros to support Bragg’s candidacy.

DailyMail.com revealed in February last year that the donation was cut in half after an allegation was made against Bragg, which he strongly denied.

Soros donated the money to the Color of Change PAC as part of a $40 million campaign to support district attorney campaigns across the country, according to a January 2023 report.

Matt Palumbo, author of The Man Behind the Curtain: Inside George Soros’s Secret Web, said the Soros funding was incredibly successful in achieving his goals of electing left-leaning district attorneys.

“He’s had a success rate of over 90% in picking many of these prosecutors,” he told Fox News in January.

“I hate to use the term brilliance with Soros, but one of the brilliant things that he realized is… when you want to do political reform with law and order and in this case demote it, going through a DA is very efficient because it doesn’t have to go through a state legislature, it doesn’t have to go through a mayor.’

Kevin McCarthy, the Speaker of the House, also criticized the investigation.

He said Saturday: “Here we go again: an outrageous abuse of power by a radical district attorney who lets violent criminals walk while seeking political revenge against President Trump.”

“I am directing the relevant committees to immediately investigate whether federal funds are being used to subvert our democracy by interfering in elections with politically motivated prosecutions.”

Legal experts have questioned whether the case against Trump will prosper.

Jonathan Turley, criminal defense attorney and Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, He said: ‘This is a flawed case if it is based on a state charge effectively prosecuting federal election violation.

That federal case was thrown out by the Justice Department. There are also statute of limitation questions that could come into play.

‘Bragg can look forward to highly motivated judges and juries in New York. However, the novelty and questions in this case would present difficult appellate problems for the prosecution.’

But Turley also said Trump must “cover up any inflammatory rhetoric” after the former president called for protests amid the impending charges. Trump had announced that he would be arrested in a matter of days, adding “PROTEST, TAKE BACK OUR NATION!”

Trump could be charged with falsifying business records in connection with payments to his former attorney, Michael Cohen, who served jail time after pleading guilty to using campaign finances in connection with Daniels. The former president could also face charges related to violations of electoral law.

He would become the first former president in history to face criminal charges if indicted.

Elon Musk, one of the world’s richest men, responded to the development on Saturday by saying that if impeached, Trump would be “re-elected with a landslide” in the 2024 presidential election. And legal experts say Trump could still be elected. president even if he is charged or convicted.

Trump could face up to four years in prison if charged.

But experts say the former president could still be re-elected if he is charged or even convicted over the issue. Trump has already maintained that he “wouldn’t even think of dropping out” of the race if he is impeached.

The United States Constitution does not say that a candidate cannot run if they have a criminal record. The conditions are simply that a candidate be a natural citizen who is at least 35 years old and has been a resident of the US for 14 years or more.

Kate Shaw, a legal analyst and professor at Cardozo Law School, said abc: ‘There is nothing in the Constitution that disqualifies persons convicted of crimes from running for or serving as president.’

Any issues are likely to be practical, rather than legal, Shaw said, such as jail time making the campaign “difficult, if not impossible.”