The Sony Spider-Man universe was doomed from the start, and there are only two ways to save it without Tom Holland’s popular web-slinger
Another year, the death of a new cinematic universe. Just 12 months later Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom put the final nail in the coffin of the DC Extended Universe (DCEU), Kraven the Hunterone of the last new films of 2024, will do the same with the Sony Spider-Man Universe (SSU).
Indeed, a new report from The coverwith input from Sony Pictures insiders, all but confirms that the SSU, previously – and confusingly – called the Sony Pictures Universal of Marvel Characters (SPUMC), is being axed less than a decade after its inception.
Frankly, no one should be surprised by this development. Sony may have gotten lucky with the release of Poisonthe 2018 Spidey spin-off starring Tom Hardy that, despite mediocre reviews from critics, stunned industry experts with a gross of $856 million at the box office. But even then it was clear that the SSU would never be able to sustain that success because of the giant elephant – or should that be a spider? – in the room.
Yes, the absolutely bizarre decision to a single live-action version of Spider-Man – Tobey Maguire, Andrew Garfield or current incumbent Tom Holland – in any of SSU’s six films was a big mistake. You can’t try to replicate the success and popularity of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) by building a franchise without having one person to hold it all together. Warner Bros. wouldn’t create a Batman cinematic universe where the Dark Knight never appears, is only referenced once or twice per film, and has projects based on his iconic rogues gallery whose origin stories have to undergo significant changes to work around the issues. The absence of Caped Crusader. It would be an impossible task that I and many other Batman fans would find difficult to comprehend.
Why did Sony pursue a Spider-Man-less film franchise? The short answer is that it wanted a piece of the juggernaut pie of the superhero genre. The company’s multimedia division saw the kind of money the MCU and, at the time, the DCEU were bringing in, and thought it could create a similar money-grubbing franchise. Unfortunately for Sony Poison turned out to be an outlier. Sure it made a lot of money, but the diminishing returns of its sequels and other SSU films – Kraven is expected to make a paltry $13 million to $15 million (per Variety) at the US box office – proving that audiences have grown tired not only of a franchise that lacks its primary superhero, but also of a franchise whose genre identity was as clear as mud.
The much longer answer lies in Sony’s decision to agree to an Avengers-style partnership with Marvel Studios and finally bring Spider-Man into the MCU. After debuting as an iconic webslinger in 2016 Captain America: Civil Warthe Dutch Peter Parker/Spider-Man has become one of the crown jewels of the MCU. Just look at the worldwide revenues of over $4 billion that Holland’s three standalone MCU films have collectively amassed, and you’ll realize just how popular the Dutch version of the legendary superhero is.
Okay, 2021 Spider-Man: No way home was aided by a huge dose of nostalgia, but it’s still a film helmed by an actor who has become a bona fide A-lister over the past eight years. Some of the Netherlands’ non-Marvel projects, such as Apple TV Plus’ Cherry And The busy roomand Sony’s film adaptation of the Naughty Dog video game series Not mappedwere unpopular with critics. However, audiences were immediately drawn to them because of Holland’s involvement, so his star power cannot be overlooked.
So the SSU’s biggest problem existed long before it started. Sony couldn’t create its own movie franchise with Holland’s Spider-Man because he exists in another movie, aka the MCU.
Certainly, the ongoing Marvel Multiverse Saga is breaking the barriers between cinematic universes based on Marvel Comics’ ever-expanding roster of heroes and villains. That didn’t help Sony’s case, though, as the SSU started before the Multiverse Saga. Besides the strange reference in Venom: Let there be carnage And MorbiusSony also made no concerted effort to support a crossover event by denying the existence of Holland’s Spider-Man.
Sony can argue that Spider-Man wouldn’t exist in the MCU without its partnership with Marvel and that because it retains the rights to the webhead, its legion of associated characters and film distribution rights, it still holds the cards from a negotiation perspective. But let’s be honest: People watch Spider-Man movies because a) he’s one of the most popular superheroes of all time and b) he’s currently part of the largest shared cinematic universe to ever exist. Sorry, Sony, but neither of these have anything to do with you.
So, what’s the solution? Just like Spider-Man: No way home Also known as one of the best Marvel films and best superhero films, kicking off a hard reset for its eponymous hero in the MCU, the SSU requires a reboot not unlike that of James Gunn’s reborn DC Cinematic Universe (DCU).
To me, there are two ways Sony can revive its film franchise. The first and simplest option is to just keep making Spider-Man projects that aren’t tied to their counterparts. At the moment there are three such productions in active development: number one, Spider Man 4i.e. the wallcrawler’s next MCU adventure that will be part of the Marvel Phase 6 lineup. Number two, Nic Cage starring Spider Man Noir TV show released on Prime Video. And number three, Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Versethe third and last Spider-Verse film that concludes the story of Miles Morales and Spider-Gwen in the multi-award winning animated film series. Maintain that separation, constantly reminding the audience that they are not connected in any way, and humans shall check them out.
The other, perhaps more complicated solution is to bring back one of Spidey’s former live-action stars in Maguire or Garfield, or reboot a live-action Spider-Man universe with someone like Miles Morales at its heart. Indeed, complications may arise when trying to convince Maguire or Garfield to return for a multi-picture deal, with the former largely keeping a low profile these days while the latter finds success with non-superhero projects. As for Miles, Sony should convince fans that this iteration isn’t the same one that starred him Spider-Verse films, which would confuse the viewer if not explained effectively.
Sony should ensure that no related issue arises if Maguire or Garfield returns. Audiences may be wondering if future films starring either of them will be a continuation of their Spider-Man film franchises. If Sony only does a soft reboot of the SSU, it risks creating confusion if any of its previous SSU films, such as Poison are considered canon in any new franchise. The DCU has already confused some viewers with such a scenario – Creature commandsthe first DCU Chapter One project, including references to the DCEUs The suicide squad And Peacemaker.
I love Spider-Man. He’s my favorite superhero of all time and while I’m glad he’s a part of the MCU, it was incredibly frustrating to see his legacy damaged by Sony’s hackneyed approach to its illustrious rogues gallery. If – and it’s a huge if – Sony revives the SSU after a long hiatus, I really hope it does justice to the infamous wallcrawler. After all, “with great power comes great responsibility.”