Oldest human DNA from Britain may have been from a cannibal
>
The oldest known human DNA from Britain to date represents two distinct groups – one of which may have practiced cannibalism, a new study says.
Researchers in London analysed the DNA of two late British individuals who lived towards the end of the Old Stone Age.
One of the individuals was found in Gough’s Cave in Somerset, while the other was recovered from Kendrick’s Cave in North Wales.
The Gough’s Cave individual was female and lived 14,900 years ago, while the Kendrick’s Cave individual was male and lived 13,600 years ago, experts say.
Results indicate each belonged to a distinct group that migrated to Britain at the end of the last Ice Age, both with very different dietary practices.
The female from Gough’s Cave was part of a group that likely practiced cannibalism, while the second group’s diet was predominantly marine and freshwater foods.
A new study suggests the presence of two distinct groups in Britain at the end of the last Ice Age, including one that might have practiced cannibalism. This group, based in Gough’s Cave in Somerset, may have used their victim’s skulls to drink out of after eating their flesh. Pictured are these ‘skull cups’ now being held by the National History Museum
Skull bowls and other fragments from Gough’s Cave. The Gough’s Cave individual analysed for this study was female and lived around 14,900 years ago
For this study, researchers analysed DNA from two individuals – one found in Gough’s Cave in Somerset, and the other from Kendrick’s Cave in North Wales. Researchers the Gough’s Cave individual shares genetic ancestry data associated with a 15,000-year-old individual from Belgium (‘Goyet Q2’). Meanwhile, the Kendrick’s Cave individual shares ancestry with the 14,000-year-old Villabruna individual from Italy
The new study was led by experts at the Natural History Museum, University College London (UCL), and the Francis Crick Institute, and published in Nature Ecology & Evolution.
‘We really wanted to find out more about who these early populations in Britain might have been,’ said study author Dr Selina Brace at the Natural History Museum.
‘We knew from our previous work, including the study of Cheddar Man, that western hunter-gatherers were in Britain by around 10,500 years before present.
‘But we didn’t know when they first arrived in Britain, and whether this was the only population that was present.’
DNA from the Gough’s Cave individual indicates that her ancestors were part of the initial migration into northwest Europe.
Meanwhile, the individual from Kendrick’s Cave is from a later period, around 13,500 years ago, and his ancestry is from a group known as ‘western hunter-gatherers’, who have their ancestral origins in the Near East.
The study found that these populations were not just genetically different, but culturally different too.
‘Chemical analyses of the bones showed that the individuals from Kendrick’s Cave ate a lot of marine and freshwater foods, including large marine mammals,’ said study author Dr Rhiannon Stevens at UCL.
‘Humans at Gough’s Cave, however, showed no evidence of eating marine and freshwater foods, and primarily ate terrestrial herbivores such as red deer, bovids (such as wild cattle called aurochs) and horses.’
Engraved human temporal bone from Gough’s Cave in Somerset, analysed for this new study
Close-up of the Gough’s Cave bone, which once belonged to a female individual that lived around 15,000 years ago
There were no animal bones showing evidence of being eaten by humans at Kendrick’s Cave, indicating that the cave was used as a burial site by its occupiers.
Animal bones that were found included portable art items such as a decorated horse mandible (lower jaw).
In contrast, animal and human bones found in Gough’s Cave showed significant human modification, including human skulls that had been modified into ‘skull-cups’ and interpreted as evidence for ritualistic cannibalism.
Human remains from Kendrick’s Cave (North Wales), which date to around 13,600 years ago
Human jaw from Kendrick’s Cave dated to 13,600 years ago. The oldest known human DNA from Britain to date is presented in a paper published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
The individuals were part of populations that entered Britain several thousands of years after the Last Glacial Maximum, a major climatic event where temperatures plummeted around 20,000 years ago.
Although humans lived in Britain prior to the Last Glacial Maximum, occupation was sparse, as extensive ice sheets meant that much of the island was uninhabitable until the ice began to melt approximately 19,000 years ago.
Around 17,000 years ago, as the climate warmed and the glaciers continued to melt, humans began to move back into northern Europe.
‘The period we were interested in, from 20-10,000 years ago, is part of the Palaeolithic – the Old Stone Age,’ said study author Dr Sophy Charlton at the University of York.
‘This is an important time period for the environment in Britain, as there would have been significant climate warming, increases in the amount of forest, and changes in the type of animals available to hunt.
‘There are very few human remains of this age in Britain; perhaps around a dozen individuals from six sites.’
Researchers say the Gough’s Cave individual shares genetic ancestry data associated with a 15,000-year-old individual from Belgium (‘Goyet Q2’).
Meanwhile, the Kendrick’s Cave individual shares ancestry with the 14,000-year-old Villabruna individual from Italy.
However, the individual from Kendrick’s Cave shows no evidence of having ancestry related to the older Gough’s Cave individual.
Human teeth from Kendrick’s Cave (North Wales) which date to around 13,600 years ago.
This indicates that there were two genetically distinct groups in Britain within approximately 1,000 years of each other, mirroring so-called ‘dual ancestry’ patterns seen elsewhere in Europe during the late Pleistocene period, experts say.
‘Finding the two ancestries so close in time in Britain, only a millennium or so apart, is adding to the emerging picture of Palaeolithic Europe, which is one of a changing and dynamic population,’ said study author Dr Mateja Hajdinjak at the Francis Crick Institute.
Writing in an accompanying News & Views piece, Chantel Conneller, a pre-history researcher at Newcastle University who was not involved with the study, said it ‘provides new evidence for the genetic makeup of Late Upper Palaeolithic people in Britain’.
However, she warned of the ‘inevitable simplification’ that comes from organizing and interpreting DNA data on a large scale.
‘Palaeolithic archaeology with its relatively imprecise chronologies and small datasets is particularly vulnerable to claims of synchronicity for population events and material culture changes that may be hundreds or even thousands of years apart,’ she writes.