International anger erupts over Anthony Albanese’s ‘Trump-style travel ban’ on tourists from up to FIVE countries – as one nation set to be blacklisted rages and another expresses confusion

The Albanian government’s proposed “Trump-style” travel ban has sparked an international outcry, with the Russian embassy criticizing the measure and Iraqi officials caught off guard by the potential changes.

The federal government this week attempted to push legislation through parliament to ban visitors from overseas, including tourists, from coming to Australia.

The countries expected to be blacklisted include Iran, Iraq, Russia, South Sudan and Zimbabwe. These countries will not accept citizens deported from Australia, and the government hopes a travel ban can force them to withdraw.

But Daily Mail Australia can reveal the proposal, which has been stalled in Parliament, is causing a diplomatic headache for the government.

A spokesperson for the Russian Embassy in Canberra told Daily Mail Australia that including Russia in this proposed legislation is “quite far-fetched”.

Tourists from at least five countries could be banned from traveling to Australia if Labour’s tough new migration laws are passed by parliament. It is possible that more will follow

A spokesperson for the Russian Embassy in Canberra told Daily Mail Australia that the inclusion of Russia in this proposed legislation is

A spokesperson for the Russian Embassy in Canberra told Daily Mail Australia that the inclusion of Russia in this proposed legislation is “quite far-fetched”.

“We can hardly recall a single instance in which the Australian government expressed concern about the removal of a Russian citizen who had no valid reason to stay, or asked us to cooperate in such a removal,” the spokesperson said angrily.

The Russian embassy has not been contacted or informed by the Australian government about the legislation or its possible consequences, the spokesperson added.

Opinion poll

Do you support Labour’s proposed ‘Trump-style’ travel ban?

  • YES 1604 votes
  • NO 290 votes
  • It’s desperation 386 votes

When contacted by Daily Mail Australia, the Iraqi embassy in Canberra appeared caught off guard and asked for information about the proposal.

The travel ban proposal comes as the government braces for a Supreme Court case on April 17, known as ASF17, that could further fuel controversy over its approach to immigration.

The government was under fire for weeks after the Supreme Court released 149 detainees, including criminals, onto the streets in the NZYQ case last November.

The applicant in this new case is an Iranian man who refuses to cooperate with his deportation because he fears he will be persecuted and risk the death penalty if he returns to Iran as a bisexual man.

There are currently around 200 people in immigration detention in similar circumstances, and the government fears the High Court could order their release before Parliament signs off on the rule change.

Potentially affected diasporas have expressed their disapproval of the legislation in the days since it was announced.

Human rights lawyers have described it as “the pure definition of discrimination” and “Trumpian”, while others questioned whether Labor would ever have supported the Coalition if the tables were turned.

The travel ban proposal comes as the government braces for a Supreme Court case on April 17, known as ASF17, that could further fuel controversy over its approach to immigration.

The travel ban proposal comes as the government braces for a Supreme Court case on April 17, known as ASF17, that could further fuel controversy over its approach to immigration.

Both Ms O'Neil and Immigration Minister Andrew Giles held a press conference on Wednesday to express their disappointment

Both Ms O’Neil and Immigration Minister Andrew Giles held a press conference on Wednesday to express their disappointment

In another bitter blow to the government, the Greens and the Coalition voted to postpone the legislation on Wednesday.

They sent it to a Senate inquiry to investigate, which could take months for the report to come back – with the clock ticking for Labour.

Greens senator David Shoebridge denounced the proposal as “Trump-style immigration laws buried in Labour’s deportation bill.”

‘They are intended to blacklist citizens of entire countries from obtaining visas for Australia.

“Fortunately we were able to bring this back from the brink with an investigation in the Senate, but the threat is still real.”

The matter is expected to return to Parliament the same week the budget is presented.

Following the disappointing outcome in the Senate Labor, Home Secretary Clare O’Neil and Immigration Minister Andrew Giles held a brief press conference expressing their frustration with the situation.

Ms O’Neil said: ‘We are very disappointed that the Liberals have hampered our efforts. The reason we need this is because we are trying to run an orderly migration system in this country.

“Because of a decade of willful neglect, we have an immigration system that is… fundamentally broken.”

Ms O’Neil accused the Coalition of ‘playing politics’ with the matter.

Opposition immigration spokesman Dan Tehan said on Wednesday morning there was not enough clarity or information to pass the bill straight away.

‘Once again we see a completely failed government process.

“What we want to do is really scrutinize this piece of legislation – it’s a serious piece of legislation – it deserves scrutiny, and everyone in the Senate agreed that it needed scrutiny, except the administration.”

Your questions about the ‘Trump-style travel ban’ explained

How would the new ‘tourist ban’ work?

The proposed ‘tourist ban’ will only apply to countries that do not accept involuntary deportations.

The government hopes that the mere threat of an entry ban into Australia will be enough to encourage cooperation from these countries.

Officials hope the law will give them leverage over the countries so Australia can deport citizens who have no real claim to enter Australia.

An example of this is the case that will appear before the Supreme Court next month.

An Iranian man refuses to cooperate with efforts to deport him because he is bisexual and faces the death penalty if he returns home.

Iran does not accept citizens returning without their consent.

What was Donald Trump’s travel ban compared to?

In 2017, then-US President Donald Trump imposed a travel ban that banned entry into the United States for most citizens of Iran, Syria, Yemen, Libya and Somalia. He later added North Korea and Venezuela to the list.

President Joe Biden repealed the ban when he took office.

If re-elected, Trump has promised to reinstate it and extend it to people from Gaza.

Why will it take so long for the Albanian government’s new laws to be passed by parliament?

Labor was counting on coalition support to ensure this bill would be passed by parliament this week.

The Greens are against stricter detention policies and immediately expressed their disdain for the bill. The crossbench in the House of Representatives also voted against. Human rights organizations have also labeled the proposal as inhumane.

While the Coalition is not necessarily opposed to the contents of the bill, they have argued that they were not given enough time to examine the proposal as they were only informed on Tuesday morning during an already shortened parliamentary session week.

Opposition spokesman James Paterson said his party was acting in “good faith” on Tuesday in allowing the bill to pass the House of Representatives for further scrutiny at a hastily arranged hearing in the Senate, but claimed on Wednesday that their questions were not answered properly.

So now the party has teamed up with the Greens to force the bill to be put to an inquiry in the Senate, meaning it will be impossible to get through parliament on Wednesday, as Labor had hoped.

The Coalition has left the door open to returning to Parliament during the break to debate the issue, but only if Labor proves there is a real, urgent need for the laws.

Labor has tried to argue that the legislation is simply about closing a newly discovered loophole, and has not tried to link this bill to the Supreme Court case on April 17.

To get the bill passed before that case, the coalition may hope that they will admit that the two cases are related.