How an open convention works… and how it could backfire and cost Kamala Harris and the Democrats the 2024 election

President Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race on Sunday, clearing the way for Democrats to pick a new presidential nominee. The president immediately endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race, but she has not yet fully committed.

Harris confirmed she will run for the Democratic presidential nomination shortly after the president’s shock announcement.

A growing number of Democratic leaders, including some top lawmakers, governors and party leaders, immediately backed the vice president in her bid for the White House.

She hopes to drum up support before Democrats head to Chicago next month for the Democratic National Convention, which begins Aug. 19.

The Tennessee delegation has unanimously decided to support Harris, a source confirmed to DailyMail.com on Sunday.

The South Carolina, North Carolina and New Hampshire delegations also announced unanimous support for the vice president. Other delegations are expected to make decisions soon.

But some Democratic lawmakers have said they are waiting to see how the process plays out and have not yet moved to support Harris. Former President Obama was among those who did not voice support Sunday.

Meanwhile, Senator Joe Manchin is considering re-registering with the Democratic Party and running for the nomination.

The uncertainty following Biden’s announcement just over 100 days before Election Day means Democrats could hold a brokered convention for the first time in more than 70 years. It opens the door to a wild and potentially grueling nominating process at next month’s convention, in which votes must be cast until a nominee is chosen by a majority of voting delegates.

A brokered convention is a presidential nominating convention in which delegates fail to nominate a candidate on the first ballot. This means that no candidate receives the votes of more than half of the delegates in the first round.

In the past, mediated congresses were held regularly because the major parties did not hold primaries to allocate delegates, as they do now.

This led to a series of complicated negotiations among some of the party’s power brokers, typically federal and state leaders, including party officials, legislators and governors.

Voting takes place in a round of ballots until one candidate has a majority of the delegates.

The last time a mediated congress took place was in 1952.

Ultimately, the Democrats were able to nominate Democrat Adlai Stevenson on the third ballot. Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower fell just nine votes short on the first ballot that year, prompting some delegates to change their votes to make him the official nominee.

The longest brokered convention to date took place 100 years ago in 1924, when Democrats needed 16 days and 103 ballots to nominate diplomat John Davis. Franklin Delano Roosevelt needed four ballots to secure the 1932 Democratic nomination.

“We don’t have any standards, benchmarks, or known procedures yet,” said Leonard Steinhorn, a professor at American University, about what a mediated convention might look like in 2024. “We’re kind of running wild right now,” he said.

Although the terms mediated agreement and contested agreement are often used interchangeably, there is an important difference.

A contested congress is one in which one candidate has done well, but not enough to secure a nomination on the first ballot. So another candidate tries to convince the delegates to drop the frontrunner.

According to Elaine Kamarck of the Brookings Institute, it is more common in modern times than a mediated convention.

Now that Biden is running, the convention is more of a public relations event for the party and the president, as the nominee has already been determined, in this case the incumbent president.

But if Biden drops out of the race before the convention, there will be no clear favorite unless the president passes the baton and declares his support.

Political parties have largely tried to avoid both brokered and contested conventions, as history shows that candidates who require multiple rounds of voting to be nominated are less likely to win the White House.

It’s a pressing concern as Democrats consider the best candidate to take on Trump this fall. It’s part of the reason why some Democrats have already thrown their weight behind Harris and are trying to show unity.

According to Pew, of the sixty Democratic and Republican nominating conventions from 1868, after the Civil War, through 1984, eighteen candidates were nominated on multiple ballots.

Only seven of them were elected president. Four of them competed against other nominees, who also had to vote multiple times to secure the nomination.

The last time a Democrat made a strong case for an open convention was the late Senator Ted Kennedy in 1980. The senator challenged President Jimmy Carter for the nomination. Ultimately, delegates had to stick to their state results when voting. But Carter lost the election that fall to Ronald Reagan.

Before that, Republican President Gerald Ford went into the 1976 convention with a clear majority of delegates, but not the number necessary to secure the nomination, leading to a serious challenge from then-Governor Reagan. He eventually won on the first ballot, but lost the election to Carter.

“You want a party that is united behind the person who appears to be the popular choice of the members of that party, of the voters,” Steinhorn noted.

If the nominee were to be determined at the convention, the party and campaign would have to make efforts to introduce the nominee to the public, raise money, and campaign before Election Day.

It would be beneficial for Democrats to have to attend a brokered party convention in 2024. No matter who their candidate is, their opponent is Trump.

‘T“This is going to be an unusual year because Donald Trump has very, very high negative numbers,” Steinhorn said.

Although Democrats are lagging behind in message and commitment in November, there could be an important difference.

“Because Donald Trump is so extraordinarily unpopular as the opposing party’s nominee, it potentially gives the Democratic Party a slight advantage,” he added.