>
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have shared a series of photos of their daughter Lilibet in the latest episodes of their Netflix series, including the young royal just days after her birth and images of her celebrating her first birthday.
The adorable pictures show the diminutive baby, now 16 months old, stretching out into a series of cute babies, including one emblazoned with the words ‘Petite Lili’.
The photographs, which appear in episode six, also show Archie’s three-year-old younger sister Lilibet, scrunching up her face in her sleep and being gently stroked on the hand by their father, Prince Harry.
In several of the photos, Meghan, 41, who gave birth to her second child on June 4, 2021, is seen wrapping her infant daughter in a baby carrier while carrying her.
scroll down for video
The second part of the Prince Harry and Meghan Markle docuseries was released today in a teaser clip, with episode six showing a series of images of Lilibet as a newborn.
There are also glimpses of how the family celebrated their first birthday in the garden of Frogmore Cottage during the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations.
At a linen-covered table in the garden, the couple with their two children are seen helping one-year-old Lilibet blow out the candles on her first birthday cake.
The first three episodes of Harry & Meghan, part of the Sussexes’ multi-million dollar deal with Netflix, aired last week, with the final three hour-long episodes airing starting today.
The Sussexes’ six-part show, part of their multi-million dollar deal with Netflix, has become the streaming giant’s most watched documentary in a week of release, debuting with 81.55 million hours watched.
The initial installment covered the couple’s courtship and romance, but many were deeply unhappy with the show’s assault on the late Queen’s Commonwealth legacy, with some saying it appeared the couple wanted to “overthrow the monarchy”.
There are also glimpses of how the family celebrated their first birthday at Frogmore Cottage during the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations earlier this year.
At a linen-covered table in the garden, the couple with their two children are seen helping one-year-old Lilibet blow out the candles on her first birthday cake.
In one of the photos, Meghan, 41, who gave birth to her second child on June 4, 2021, is seen wrapping her sleeping daughter in a baby carrier as she carries her.
The adorable photos show the newborn baby, now one, including this one with what appears to be Prince Harry’s hand touching his daughter’s tiny fist.
Hello world: Lilibet is captured asleep with the legend June 4, 2021: the day she was born
Covered in a blanket and wearing a little hat, the photos show baby Lilibet dozing, with what appears to be her father’s hand gently caressing hers. The tiny newborn is seen scrunching up her face in another photo.
Harry also dropped a number of sly hints at his family, particularly his father and brother, including the suggestion that they had married not for love but rather a woman who fit ‘the mold’.
The duke also said his family members questioned why Meghan needed more media protection than their wives had been afforded, but failed to understand the “racial element”.
Royal pundits were quick to declare the claims made in the trailer yesterday “nonsense”, while one commenter said the series was clearly a “form of revenge”.
In a clip, Meghan’s British privacy lawyer, Jenny Afia, insisted that she had seen evidence of the conspiracy against the Duchess before Lucy Fraser, whose real name is Lucy Meadmore, a former public relations manager who was a mysterious figure. until a week ago, he says, “Meg became the scapegoat.” for the Palace.
The Duchess herself also suggested that she was made a scapegoat, adding: “You’d see.” A story about someone in the family would come up for a minute and they’d say, ‘We’ve got to make that go away.
But the royal editor of the Daily Mail, Rebecca English, said last night that only someone “totally ignorant of the media” would suggest that she would steer clear of a story about a member of the royal family in exchange for a derogatory story about Meghan or Harry.
Writing in the Mail, he said he “never heard a negative word” about the Sussexes until “at least six months after their marriage, and then not from anyone within the palace walls.”
In fact, Mrs English believed that the assistants did their best to keep up appearances when it appeared that “all was not well” at the Sussexes’ home.
She added: ‘Staff, they insisted, were leaving for personal reasons or because they had an exciting new opportunity to take advantage of. Never for Meghan.
“Even when I personally witnessed his assault on a member of his team, leaving this individual crying in humiliation, I was told, with a straight face, that it had simply been a ‘security incident.’
“I had standing arguments with palace staff when I suggested they had saved money with the truth and my fact-checking calls about the stories I intended to publish were met with open sighs of frustration.”
He also said he opted to omit Harry’s “frankly rude and unprofessional behavior towards the press” from his copy, as the 38-year-old’s “impressive charity work deserved to be the star of the show”.
She added: “The truth is that the negative stories about Harry and Meghan only started to emerge when their behavior became so disgusting that it was impossible to hide it,” she wrote.
“And that’s not something I expect you to hear when today’s dramatic finale hits Netflix.”
There were mounting calls overnight to see evidence of the highly damaging claim, with a royal source declaring: “No one is taking any lessons in honesty from them.”
Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams also called on the filmmakers to back up the claims made.
Responding to the trailer posted yesterday, Mr Fitzwilliams told MailOnline that it showed “what a huge coup for Netflix this docuseries is”.
He added: ‘The claim is that the Palace used Meghan as a ‘scapegoat’ so that other damaging stories about other royals would go away.
So the question is, for the benefit of which royals and who knew? What other members of the royal family were involved or did the courtiers report without their knowledge?
William was named in an earlier trailer by Harry. This will be catastrophic for the relationship between the once close brothers.
‘What exactly is the evidence to support your claim that Meghan was ‘fed to the wolves’?
“Essentially, the claim is that the institution was working against them and using the media to discredit them with a barrage of negative articles. His lawyer Jenny Afia says that she has seen evidence. However, what evidence will be shown to us?
He added: ‘This is certainly a form of revenge. It remains to be seen after the series airs, if the royals will respond, and if so, how.
Read more: