Google fined $60million after misleading Australians on location, tracking data
>
Google is slapped with huge $60million fine after promising Australians it wasn’t tracking them when it was
- Google received fine after misleading users on collection of personal data
- Federal Court of Australia last year found Google breached consumer laws
- Misleading users on the collection of data about location via mobile devices
<!–
<!–
<!–<!–
<!–
<!–
<!–
Google has agreed to pay $60 million in penalties flowing from a long-running court fight with the Australian competition watchdog over the tech giant misleading users on the collection of personal location data.
In April last year, the Federal Court of Australia found Google breached consumer laws by misleading some local users into thinking the company was not collecting personal data about their location via mobile devices with Android operating systems.
The case revolved around whether it was sufficiently clear Google would still collect and access location data when a user’s location history was set to ‘off’ but their web and app activity was ‘on’ and one of its apps was used.
Google (pictured) agreed to pay a $60million fine after the were last year found to be in breach of consumer laws by misleading users into thinking the company was not collecting personal data about their location via mobile devices with Android operating systems
The company was also found in breach of two other consumer laws concerning conduct liable to mislead the public and making misleading representations about a service’s performance characteristics.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission at the time called the judgment a clear message to digital platforms to be up front with consumers about what is happening with their data.
On Friday, a brief Federal Court hearing was told a $60 million penalty was agreed as ‘fair and reasonable’ between the parties and that a joint submission had been submitted to Justice Thomas Thawley.
On Friday, a brief Federal Court of Australia (pictured) hearing was told a $60 million penalty was agreed as ‘fair and reasonable’ between the parties
The court heard possible issues still in play were whether the penalty made future conduct ‘economically irrational’ and if the penalty was suitable.
Justice Thawley said he was satisfied the fine was in an appropriate range and thanked the parties before adjourning the case until later on Friday.