Experts warn Gila monsters ‘could bite at any time’ – 34-year-old Colorado man dies in first fatal incident in 94 years

This week, a 34-year-old Colorado man died in an extremely rare reaction to the bite of his pet Gila monster.

The man, whose identity remains unknown, was bitten by a young Gila monster and died, marking the first fatal case of a Gila monster bite in the past 94 years.

Experts have now warned that such an incident was ‘inevitable’.

Chris Lewis, captivity research officer at wildlife charity Born Free, told MailOnline that you can’t know if you’ll have a fatal reaction until it’s too late.

Mr Lewis said incidents like this ‘will always be inevitable when people keep animals in conditions that are unnatural to them.’

A 34-year-old Colorado man died days after being bitten by a venomous Gila lizard he owned as a pet

The Gila monster is unique among North American lizards because of its venom, which it secretes through its lower jaw.

The venom is known to cause swelling, burning pain, vomiting, dizziness and low blood pressure, which can lead to fainting.

However, the last recorded death from a Gila monster bite was in 1930, more than 90 years ago.

It is believed the man may have suffered an allergic reaction four days after being bitten.

Mr Lewis said: ‘It is widely believed that the poison is not fatal and that this person has had an allergic reaction.

‘But what this highlights is that no matter how poisonous an animal is, it will always pose a risk if kept as a pet.’

Mr Lewis points out that there is ‘no single precautionary test’ that owners can carry out to see if they are at risk of a fatal allergic reaction.

He explained: ‘Until someone is bitten, they won’t know if they are allergic to the animal’s venom.’

The Gila monster is unique among North American lizards for its venom, which it secretes through its lower jaw

Is it legal to own a Gila monster in Britain?

Since 2007, the Gila monster has been categorized as a dangerous animal under the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976.

This means that while it is legal to own one, a special license is required.

An inspection by the municipal veterinary officer is required for a permit.

Potential owners must prove they have suitable housing that will prevent the Gila monster from escaping.

Although their venom is rarely fatal, the Gila monster’s bite is powerful and can still be dangerous and extremely painful.

A care sheet from exotic pet store Reptile Rapture states: ‘A Gila is often docile, which can give you a false sense of security. It can bite at any time.

“Sometimes the only way to release the lizard’s grip is to submerge it in water or squirt hand sanitizer into its mouth.”

In both the US and UK, owners need a special license to own a Gila monster.

Mr Lewis says Born Free’s latest research shows there are at least 38 Gila monsters in private hands in Britain.

However, he says existing laws are not enough to protect owners of poisonous animals.

“There is very little, if anything, in the legislation that requires the safety of the owner or other people in the home,” he said.

Safely handling venomous lizards requires training and adequate bite-resistant gloves, neither of which are a requirement for owning a Gila monster.

Gila monster bites are not fatal, but their jaws are so strong that one pet store recommends holding the animal under water or squirting hand sanitizer in its mouth to release it

Gila monsters also have extremely long lifespans and require expensive specialist equipment to keep them healthy.

Mr Lewis added: ‘It is completely bizarre that members of the public can keep animals that are categorized as dangerous.’

In the wild, Gila monsters are not particularly aggressive animals.

They are extremely slow and rely on their natural camouflage to blend in and ambush small mammals and birds.

When threatened, Mr. Lewis explains, Gila monsters are more likely to hide or flee and will only bite as an absolute last resort when under a lot of stress.

However, placing these animals in captivity significantly increases the risk that they will feel the need to bite defensively.

Dr. Charlotte Regan, wildlife manager at World Animal Protection, told MailOnline: ‘In the wild, human-Gila monster interactions are quite rare; they are usually active at night and spend a lot of time underground.

“Being kept in captivity as a pet fundamentally places the Gila monster in an unnatural environment and conditions, including proximity to humans.”

PEOPLE HAVE KEPT ANIMALS AS PETS FOR MILLENNIANS

Pets have been human companions for thousands of years.

According to Greger Larson, director of the University of Oxford’s Paleogenomics and Bioarchaeological Research Network, humans have likely kept baby animals for entertainment for as long as humans have lived.

But the story of exactly how animals came to be domesticated is much debated and often only glimpsed from bits of fossils and DNA.

Scientists largely agree that dogs were the first pets. They were tamed and used for work or for their meat.

A study published by researchers at the University of Maine in 2011 found evidence that dogs were bred and eaten by people living in Texas about 9,400 years ago.

A more recent study from 2017 found that dogs were domesticated at one time by people living in Eurasia.

Dr. Krishna Veeramah, assistant professor of evolution at Stony Brook University, told MailOnline: ‘We have found clear evidence that dogs were domesticated 20,000 to 40,000 years ago.

‘New research last year provocatively suggested that dogs could have been domesticated twice, but our conclusion was that there is no evidence for double domestication.

‘We would argue that finding evidence for just one domestication event is a big problem because it is very important in helping us understand how domestication works.’

His research showed that dogs evolved into a separate species from wild wolves sometime between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago.

But it is not known whether these were the first pets and were kept as companions.

A study this year found that the genomes, or complete genetic codes, of modern domesticated and wild rabbits were compared to see how long it took for them to diverge.

Using the known mutation rate of certain biomolecules as a ‘molecular clock’, they discovered that it was not possible to pin the domestication of rabbits to a single date or event.

Instead, the creation of tame buns seemed to be a cumulative effect dating back to Roman times and possibly the Stone Age.

The story of domestication is not a linear progression from wild to domesticated, Larsen said Smithsonian.

“These things exist on a continuum,” Larson says. He said the creation of the first pet is “a bit like asking: When did life begin?”

Related Post