EXCLUSIVE: ‘Psychotic, soulless’ serial killer Robert Spahalski DEFENDS his heinous crimes in chilling interview – insisting his victims ‘didn’t SUFFER’ as he strangled and bludgeoned them to death before going on the run for 15 YEARS
Convicted serial killer Robert Spahalski has defended his gruesome murders, insisting in a chilling new interview that they did not suffer when he strangled or bludgeoned them to death.
Spahalski is serving 100 years behind bars for the murders of four people he knew or had a relationship with. He managed to evade the law for fifteen years, until he turned himself in to the police in 2005.
In an exclusive first look teaser from Morgan’s latest series The Killer Interview with Piers Morgan – which returns to Fox Nation on September 12 – the ailing killer is interrogated about his merciless crimes, but shows no sign of remorse for his heinous actions.
Morgan was given an hour to speak with Spahalski, who was described by law enforcement as a “psychotic, soulless human being.”
Serial killer Robert Spahalski insists his victims did not suffer when he strangled or bludgeoned them to death
He is questioned by Piers Morgan about his murders in the latest chapter of his Fox Nation series
During their confrontation, the cold-blooded killer insisted: “The people I killed did not suffer.”
A perplexed Morgan replied: “How can I believe you?” prompting a blunt Spahalaski to say, “I don’t care if you do or not.”
Elsewhere in their interview, Morgan asked if he still has “homicidal urges.”
In response to the question, Spahalski initially said he “never” does that, but quickly warned, “If you pull the trigger, you’re done.”
“What you’re saying is, if I press the wrong trigger during this interview, could you feel homicidal?” Morgan asked.
Spahalski replied, “Absolutely.”
Spahalski’s killing spree began on New Year’s Eve 1990, when he strangled his neighbor Morraine Armstrong – although he now denies playing any role in her death, despite admitting as much when he turned himself in.
In 1991, he murdered his girlfriend, Adrian Berger, in a ‘compulsive’ act, before also killing his sexual partner, Charles Grande, with two blows of a hammer.
Spahalski managed to evade the law for fifteen years, until he turned himself in to the police in 2005
He is serving 100 years for his crimes, which were committed in New York State
The killer murdered his own girlfriend, Adrian Berger, in a ‘compulsive’ act in 1991
That same year, Spahalski murdered his sexual partner, Charles Grande, whom he had met during his years as a male escort
His last victim was Vivian Irrizarry, who was murdered during a crack cocaine binge
In 2005, he knocked out Vivian Irrizarry, his girlfriend’s best friend, during a crack cocaine binge before completing the act by strangling her.
Days after killing Irrizary, Spahalski confessed to crimes that had been unsolved for a decade and a half.
“Robert Spahalski is a serial killer I’ve never met before,” Morgan said. “His crimes made him infamous.”
“I’m told Spahalski can be volatile, but he is also unique,” the presenter added, referring to the killer’s habit of taking the lives of friends and loved ones.
Killer admitted to Morgan he still has ‘homicidal thoughts’ and warned he could be triggered
Morgan returns with eight new interviews with some of the most infamous serial killers
Morgan’s new Fox series consists of eight episodes in which he comes face to face with murderous nurse Kimberly Saenz and murderers Karl Karlsen, Matt Baker, Christopher Porco and Daniel Pelosi.
Ahead of the show’s release, Morgan said: ‘I’ve interviewed thousands of people from all walks of life, including presidents, prime ministers, pop superstars, business moguls and film legends.
“But for me as a journalist, there is nothing more compelling than coming face to face with some of the most dangerous killers in the world and holding them directly accountable for their crimes.
‘This series is a fascinating collection of highly varied and explosive interviews that I am sure will leave viewers debating with family and friends whether the subject’s guilt or otherwise, and provide a gripping insight into the mentality and motivation of the killers to do what they did. .’