Many retailers offer ‘returnless refunds.’ Just don’t expect them to talk much about it

It is one of the most neglected policies of some countries largest US retailers: Sometimes they give customers full refunds and let them keep them unwanted objects at.

Returnless refunds are a tool that more and more retailers are taking advantage of keep online shoppers happy and to reduce shipping costs, handling time and other escalating costs of returned products.

Companies like AmazonWalmart and Target have decided that some items are not worth the cost or hassle to come back. Think of a $20 T-shirt that might cost $30 in shipping and handling to repair. There are also single-use items, such as a pack of plastic straws, that may be difficult to resell or medications that may be unsafe to put back on the market.

Analysts say the companies offering returnless refunds do so somewhat sporadically, typically reserving the option for low-cost items or items with limited resale value. But some online shoppers said they could also keep more expensive products.

Dalya Harel, 48, recently received a return-free refund after ordering a desk from Amazon that cost about $300. When the desk arrived, she noticed some key parts were missing and impossible to put together, Harel said. She was unable to request a replacement and get it to her lice detection service office in New York in a reasonable time because the item was out of stock.

Harel, who routinely buys towels and other products from Amazon for her business, said her team contacted the company’s customer service department. She was pleasantly surprised to learn that she would get her money back without having to return the agency.

“That’s one less headache to deal with,” Harel said. “It was very nice for us that we did not have to make an extra trip to the post office.”

She used the desk pieces to create makeshift shelves in her Brooklyn office.

While the retail practice of allowing customers to keep goods and get their money back isn’t exactly a trade secret, the way it works is shrouded in mystery. Companies are reluctant to disclose the circumstances in which they issue refunds without returns because of concerns about the potential for returns fraud.

Even if brands don’t provide details about such policies on their websites, returnless refunds are on the rise in at least some retail corners.

Amazon, which industry experts say has engaged in the practice for years, announced in August that it would expand the option to third-party sellers who generate the bulk of sales on the e-commerce giant’s platform. Under the program, merchants using the company’s fulfillment services in the US can choose to offer customers a traditional refund for purchases under $75, with no obligation to return what they ordered.

Amazon did not immediately respond to questions about how the program works. But publicly it has offered return-free refunds more directly to international sellers and those offering cheaper goods. Items sold in a new section of Amazon’s website that lets U.S. shoppers buy cheap goods shipped directly from China also are eligible for refunds without returns, according to documents seen by The Associated Press.

In January, Walmart gave a similar option to sellers selling products on its growing online marketplace, leaving it up to sellers to set price limits and determine whether and how they want to participate.

China founded e-commerce companies Shein and Temu say they are also offering return-free refunds on a small number of orders, as are Target, online shopping site Overstock and pet products e-tailer Chewy, which some customers said had encouraged them to donate unwanted items to local animal shelters.

Wayfair, another online retailer cited by some customers as offering refunds without returns, did not respond to a request for comment on its policy.

In general, retailers and brands are careful about how often they let customers keep items for free. Many of them use algorithms to determine who should get the choice and who shouldn’t.

To make this decision, the algorithms assess multiple factors, including how much to trust a customer based on past purchases: and return – patterns, shipping costs and the demand for the product in the customer’s hands, according to Sender Shamiss, CEO of goTRG, a reverse logistics company that works with retailers like Walmart.

Optoro, a company that handles returns for Best Buy, Staples and Gap Inc. helps streamline, has seen retailers assess a customer’s lifetime value and extend no-return refunds as a kind of unofficial, discreet loyalty advantagesaid CEO Amena Ali.

The king of online retail seemed to verify that the process works that way.

In a statement, Amazon said it is offering free returns on a “very small number” of items as a “convenience for customers.”

The company also said it has received positive feedback from sellers about the new program that allowed them to tell customers they could keep some products and still get reimbursed. Amazon said it was monitoring signs of fraud and establishing eligibility criteria for vendors and customers. It provided no additional details on what that entailed.

Some retailers are also strengthening the liberal returns policies they have long adhered to encourage online orders. Shoppers who liked to make purchases on their computers or mobile phones became accustomed to making their purchases digital shopping carts with the intention of returning items didn’t like it in the end.

Online shopping also grew significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, as homebound consumers reduced their trips to stores relied on sites like Amazon for everyday items. Retail companies have talked in recent years about returns becoming more expensive to process due to growing volume, rising inflation and rising inflation labor costs.

Last year, U.S. consumers returned $743 billion worth of goods, or 14.5% of the products they purchased – up from 10.6% in 2020, according to the National Retail Federation. In 2019According to loss prevention company Appriss Retail, returned goods were valued at $309 billion.

Last year, about 14% of returns were fraudulent, costing retailers $101 billion in losses, according to a joint report from the National Retail Federation and Appriss Retail. The problem extends from small-scale fraud – such as shoppers returning previously worn clothing – to more complicated schemes by fraudsters who return shoplifted items or items purchased with stolen credit cards.

Nasty to prevent excessive returnssome retailers, including H&M, Zara and J. Crew started charging customers for returns in the past year. Others have shortened their return period. Some shopping sites, such as Canadian retailer Ssense, have threatened to remove frequent repeat visitors from their platforms if they suspect abuse of their policies.

However, retailers don’t all look at returning customers the same way. Such customers can be considered “good returners” if they buy – and keep – many more items than they return, Ali said.

“Often your most profitable customers tend to be high-yield people,” she says.