Woke female judge is SUSPENDED after she accused prosecutor of going after black men, changed jury’s verdict and convicted defendant of non-existent crime

A woke female judge has been disbarred after accusing a prosecutor of attacking “every young black man,” changing a jury’s verdict and convicting a defendant of a crime that didn’t even exist.

The Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled 5-2 to remove 19th Judicial District Judge Eboni Johnson Rose from her elected position on an interim basis — with full pay — amid a formal investigation by the Louisiana Judiciary Commission. NOLA.com reports.

The Court found that it “poses a significant threat to public health” and stated that “there appears to be no direct precedent for provisional exclusion on the basis of facts similar to those in the present case.”

Rose once accused District Attorney Hillar Moore’s office of “systematically targeting black people.”

“The young man has committed no fucking crimes. And I know the DA probably wants every young black man in jail, but I don’t,” Rose, who is Black, said in an April 29 sidebar, according to the report.

“And this case is four fucking years old now. And that’s the best you can come up with? You just go and do what, put every n***** in jail?”

The Louisiana Judiciary Commission also said it is “deeply concerned that Judge Rose’s series of clear legal errors in criminal cases, as well as her wholly inappropriate use of a vile racial slur in court … mean that Judge Rose could pose a significant threat to the public or the administration of justice if she remains in office.”

Documents obtained by Nola.com show that she apologized for her comments that day, but that she did not consider her actions serious enough to warrant being sidelined.

Her lawyers described her as “extremely remorseful” about her comments and “the impact these statements have had on the institutions and individuals involved, the public and the judiciary as a whole.”

The court cited an incident in which it accused District Attorney Hillar Moore’s office of “systematically targeting black people”

They said Rose “accepts full responsibility for her error of judgment in this regard, which resulted in an extreme departure from her character.”

The judge subsequently blamed the severe stress caused by the media coverage, saying she was at the time suffering from “hair loss, anxiety and stomach upset as a result of the constant intense media attention combined with the normal stressors” of her job.

However, she disputed the commission’s claim that she tried to force prosecutors to drop charges in the case.

Yet this incident is just one of many matters the commission is investigating against Rose, based on evidence that she has committed misconduct in four separate criminal cases.

“In another case it was alleged and reported that after a jury found a defendant not guilty, Judge Rose met with the jury and subsequently changed the verdict to guilty, resulting in the granting of a mistrial and this honorable court should reverse the mistrial and re-enter the verdict of not guilty,” the Supreme Court decision said.

In a third case, Rose is alleged to have imposed an unlawful sentence on a suspect accused of aggravated arson, but subsequently revoked the sentence along with his guilty plea.

‘Finally, a media article reported that in a fourth criminal case, Judge Rose initially convicted a defendant of a non-existent offense. After being told the verdict was invalid, she acquitted him.’

Court records show that Rose acknowledged she performed poorly in some of those cases but told the committee she always meant well.

Court records show that Rose acknowledged she had performed poorly in some of those cases, but she maintained to the commission that she always meant well.

Her conduct was “largely the unfortunate result of unintentional errors, mistakes, and inadvertent shortcomings in preparation,” Rose’s lawyers wrote.

“They were not – in any way – the result of willful indifference to its responsibilities to the judiciary, of malpractice or bad faith.”

Rose’s attorney, James Clary Jr., has also urged her to continue to cooperate with the investigation into misconduct.

“We have nothing but respect for the procedures and rules of the Supreme Court,” he told Nola.com.

“At the end of all this, we want to be better.”