Forget 45p tax, here are five middle-class tax cuts we should make
>
Overshadowing your tax cuts for everyone with a bigger tax cut for the rich is an unorthodox move.
It’s also unwise, so it’s not surprising that Kwasi Kwarteng eventually lost the battle to stick to the abolition of the 45p tax rate.
The loss of a tax cut for those making more than £150,000 a year raises the tiniest fiddles for the big earners who are wrong, but I had no problem scrapping the 45p rate.
By the time someone even hits the threshold, they’ve already paid a lot of tax: about £50,000 in total – about £40,000 in the 40p bracket and about £10,000 at base rate.
45p or not 45p? Kwasi Kwarteng had to fight back on his tax cut for Britain’s biggest earners, but there are some middle-class breaks down the ladder that could prove more popular
Likewise, it’s easy to show that someone with £250,000 gets a much better punch from the mini-Budget tax cuts than someone with £40,000, but even removing the 45p tax rate they’d still be handing around £90,000 at the income tax.
Nevertheless, it was ridiculous that Kwarteng announced the abolition of the 45p rate and took his own base rate and the cuts to National Insurance out of the headlines.
What was also wrong was to make such a reduction while maintaining higher marginal tax rates for those lower in the income bracket: the abolition of the £100,000 personal deduction and the loss of £50,000 child support, as I discuss in more detail below. detailed explanation.
Unfortunately for taxpayers in either of these positions, I imagine that after the mini-fiscal fiasco, the Chancellor will leave the tax cuts for those considered wealthy alone for a while.
But those quirks of our tax code need to be sorted out and I think there are some other middle class tax breaks that the chancellor should consider as well.
Raising tax thresholds
Tax impediment doesn’t sound fun and it isn’t. By keeping tax thresholds frozen while wages rise, governments are dragging more people into the net of higher rates.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has analyzed the federal chancellors’ tax cuts against threshold freezes and has a clear message.
It reads: ‘By 2025–26, these freezes will take away £2 for every £1 given to households through key personal tax cuts. This is not only the case globally, but households in every part of the income distribution will lose more on average from freezes over the next three years than from general austerity.’
One of the statistics is that freezing the personal deduction will create 1.4 million additional taxpayers and freezing the 40 pence threshold means that 7.7 million will have to pay higher tax rates, the highest ever and 1.6 million more than now.
The Chancellor needs to stop this sneaky tax game and commit to raising the thresholds with wages or inflation – maybe he can even come up with a double lock.
This chart shows how marginal tax rates change through the income scale, with higher effective rates for those who see child support withdrawn and lose their personal allowance than paid by the highest earners with 45p tax (This is Money / Chris Sedgwick)
End the removal of the personal allowance
The top rate of UK income tax isn’t really 45p, it’s 60p for those earning between £100,000 and just over £125,000 who have 50p removed from their personal deductions for every extra £1 they earn, leaving an effective tax rate of 60 percent.
So our income tax rates really go 20 percent, 40 percent, 60 percent, back to 40 percent and then to 45 percent.
It is very difficult to sympathize with people who make £100,000, but it is clearly wrong to make someone with a lower income pay a higher tax rate than someone with a higher income.
This insane system was put in place by Labor Chancellor Alistair Darling during the financial crisis, but from George Osborne onwards, successive Tory Chancellors have turned a blind eye to a clearly unfair scenario.
If the £100,000 threshold had risen with CPI inflation, it would now be £142,000. The chancellor could raise the threshold, but it would probably just be better to ban the removal of the personal allowance altogether.
Stop the abolition of child support cliff edge
This equally unhinged part of the tax system means that child support is phased out as a parent’s income rises between £50,000 and £60,000.
Still, two parents can make £49,000 each – £98,000 in total – and get to keep it all.
The parents whose child support has been revoked also pay a higher marginal tax rate than our buddies at 45p, losing about 51 percent of their next pound earned if they have one child and 59 percent if they have two.
Before George Osborne cooked these up and then introduced them in 2013, child support was universal. If the threshold had increased with inflation since then, it would now be £62,500.
The chancellor could raise the threshold, spread the bandwidth over which it is removed to lower the effective rate and do so more gradually, or abolish the high child support levy.
Insulation and Energy Efficiency Tax Benefit
The inevitable train crash that hit energy prices in the fall and winter was spotted on the rails last spring — at which point the government should have doubled down on insulating our homes and making them more energy efficient.
The more middle-class homeowners who did this during the warmer months, the less we had to worry about subsidizing their energy bills in the colder months.
Once again Britain failed a test of planning ahead.
The problem is that energy efficiency is a hard sell because people don’t know exactly what to do, it’s expensive and takes a long time to recoup.
This is where a tax break comes in, where people can offset money spent on insulation and energy efficiency against their income taxes. It is an incentive and shortens the payback period.
Central Britain has never fallen in love with insulating its homes, but it loves it immensely (look at solar panels in the early years of grants). A substantial tax cut on energy efficiency would do the trick.
Self-employed pension tax credit
For a generation of employees, auto-enrollment has been a good thing as it has prompted them to opt-out rather than opt-in retirement plans.
However, the self-employed are not included and we know that many save unfortunately too little.
The puzzle is what to do about this, as the employer contribution lever cannot be drawn in the same way as for employed people.
Why don’t self-employed people offer a tax credit that provides an extra incentive to save on top of the standard pension discount that everyone receives?
In their annual tax return it says how much the self-employed have contributed to a pension, we should give them a 10 per cent tax credit: that is, if someone has deposited £4,000 in pension, they will get £400 in tax credit.
Some links in this article may be affiliate links. If you click on it, we can earn a small commission. That helps us fund This Is Money and use it for free. We do not write articles to promote products. We do not allow any commercial relationship to affect our editorial independence.