Harry and Meghan share Archie’s ultrasound scan in new Netflix episodes

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle shared intimate snapshots of their son Archie’s baby scan in their new Netflix series today.

In the fourth episode of the explosive documentary, which was released today, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex opened up about how they ‘connected early on’ over their desire to be parents.

The royals then shared a series of photographs of baby scans, as well as Meghan’s blooming bump, with viewers.

The first three episodes of Harry & Meghan, part of the Sussexes’ multi-million dollar deal with Netflix, aired last week, with the final three hour-long episodes airing starting today.

In the clip, Meghan said: “One of the things we connected on very early on was that you always wanted to be a dad and I always wanted to be a mom.”

She went on to share several different scanned photos showing the baby, as well as snapshots of her tummy.

In one image, Prince Harry can be seen kissing her tummy.

Meghan explained: “We started journaling right when we found out we were pregnant.”

“We said, ‘Dear baby, we’re so excited to meet you someday,’ and we’d take snapshots and write them down in the journal.

‘Here’s an ad that came out about you today.’

Before the Netflix documentary, the Duke and Duchess were very private about their son and daughter Lili.

They rarely shared photos of their children, and actual fans saw the little ones only a few times.

However, the children played a starring role in their new £100 million Netflix documentary, with Meghan and Harry sharing a series of photographs and clips of Archie and Lili, including him seeing snow for the first time.

Very personal clips show him running on the beach, at his house, and the couple snuggling with the toddler.

The Sussexes’ six-part show, part of their multi-million dollar deal with Netflix, has become the streaming giant’s most watched documentary in a week of release, debuting with 81.55 million hours watched.

The opening installment covered the couple’s courtship and romance, but many were deeply unhappy with the show’s all-out assault on the late Queen’s Commonwealth legacy, with some saying it appeared the couple wanted to “overthrow the monarchy”.

Harry also dropped a number of sly hints at his family, particularly his father and brother, including the suggestion that they had married not for love but rather a woman who fit ‘the mold’.

The duke also said his family members questioned why Meghan needed more media protection than their wives had been afforded, but failed to understand the “racial element”.

Royal pundits were quick to declare the claims made in the trailer yesterday “nonsense”, while one commenter said the series was clearly a “form of revenge”.

In a clip, Meghan’s British privacy lawyer, Jenny Afia, insisted that she had seen evidence of the conspiracy against the Duchess before Lucy Fraser, whose real name is Lucy Meadmore, a former public relations manager who was a mysterious figure. until a week ago, he says, “Meg became the scapegoat.” for the Palace.

The Duchess herself also suggested that she was made a scapegoat, adding: “You’d see.” A story about someone in the family would come up for a minute and they’d say, ‘We’ve got to make that go away.

But the royal editor of the Daily Mail, Rebecca English, said last night that only someone “totally ignorant of the media” would suggest that she would steer clear of a story about a member of the royal family in exchange for a derogatory story about Meghan or Harry.

Writing in the Mail, he said he “never heard a negative word” about the Sussexes until “at least six months after their marriage, and then not from anyone within the palace walls.”

In fact, Mrs English believed that the assistants did their best to keep up appearances when it appeared that “all was not well” at the Sussexes’ home.

She added: ‘Staff, they insisted, were leaving for personal reasons or because they had an exciting new opportunity to take advantage of. Never for Meghan.

“Even when I personally witnessed his assault on a member of his team, leaving this individual crying in humiliation, I was told, with a straight face, that it had simply been a ‘security incident.’

“I had standing arguments with palace staff when I suggested they had saved money with the truth and my fact-checking calls about the stories I intended to publish were met with open sighs of frustration.”

He also said he opted to omit Harry’s “frankly rude and unprofessional behavior towards the press” from his copy, as the 38-year-old’s “impressive charity work deserved to be the star of the show”.

She added: “The truth is that the negative stories about Harry and Meghan only started to emerge when their behavior became so disgusting that it was impossible to hide it,” she wrote.

“And that’s not something I expect you to hear when today’s dramatic finale hits Netflix.”

There were mounting calls overnight to see evidence of the highly damaging claim, with a royal source declaring: “No one is taking any lessons in honesty from them.”

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams also called on the filmmakers to back up the claims made.

Responding to the trailer posted yesterday, Mr Fitzwilliams told MailOnline that it showed “what a huge coup for Netflix this docuseries is”.

He added: ‘The claim is that the Palace used Meghan as a ‘scapegoat’ so that other damaging stories about other royals would go away.

So the question is, for the benefit of which royals and who knew? What other members of the royal family were involved or did the courtiers report without their knowledge?

William was named in an earlier trailer by Harry. This will be catastrophic for the relationship between the once close brothers.

‘What exactly is the evidence to support your claim that Meghan was ‘fed to the wolves’?

“Essentially, the claim is that the institution was working against them and using the media to discredit them with a barrage of negative articles. His lawyer Jenny Afia says that she has seen evidence. However, what evidence will be shown to us?

He added: ‘This is certainly a form of revenge. It remains to be seen after tomorrow’s series airs, if the royals will respond, and if so, how.

Read more:

Any suggestion that the Palace ‘fed’ negative stories to the media as part of a ‘war’ against Meghan is categorically false; in fact, I ignored Harry’s downright rude and unprofessional behavior towards the press, says royal editor REBECCA ENGLISH

Harry and Meghan Netflix documentary LIVE: final three episodes released TODAY see Duchess branded as a ‘scapegoat’ as royal family prepares for further attacks

STEPHEN GLOVER: The world is getting tired of self-serving, shallow Sussexes. When their groans are long forgotten, the monarchy will still endure.