‘Leap second’ will be scrapped by 2035, as it could wreak havoc on GPS and telecoms
>
While we all know about February’s extra day during a leap year, there is another time-keeping alteration we make to our clocks that you may not have heard of.
This is the ‘leap second’ – an extra second we tack on the year to ensure Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) exactly matches up with the Earth’s rotation on its axis.
However, scientists have now agreed to scrap the leap second and let the two fall out of sync.
The decision was made because this extra second can cause problems for digital systems that rely on a regular flow of time, like GPS and telecommunications.
We will begin to forgo the leap second in 2035, but it has not yet been decided how long for, and some scientists are calling for it not to be re-added for at least a century.
Since 1972, a leap second has been added onto astronomical time whenever the gap between it and Coordinated Universal Time reaches 0.9 seconds, which occurs unpredictably
A document from the 27th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) reads: ‘The … introduction of leap seconds creates discontinuities that risk causing serious malfunctions to critical digital infrastructure.
‘Operators of digital networks and GNSS [Global Navigation Satellite System] systems have developed and applied different methods of introducing leap seconds that do not follow agreed standards.
‘The use of these different methods also generates confusion, which compromises the recognition of UTC as the sole reference time scale.’
UTC is defined by atomic clocks around the world, which tick precisely and continuously.
However, these atomic clocks do not align exactly with observed solar time, which historically defines days as a single rotation of the Earth.
The time it takes for a single planetary rotation changes every so often due to the pull of the Moon, causing the two time systems to drift apart.
Since 1972, a leap second has been added onto astronomical time whenever the gap between them reaches 0.9 seconds, which occurs unpredictably.
This has occurred 26 times since, the last of which was in 2016.
However, the Earth’s rotation has reportedly been speeding up since 2020.
A leap second may therefore need to be removed, rather than added, in the future, in order to keep observed solar time in sync with clocks.
While the addition of a leap second goes unnoticed by most, it has caused issues for the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), the body responsible for UTC.
These stem from differences in how clock representations interpret the leap second, and how some clocks even miss its inclusion.
This year’s CGPM, which occurs once every four years in Versailles Palace near Paris, saw metrologists in agreement that the leap second must go by 2035.
While it will continue to be added as required until then, afterwards, astronomical time and UTC will be left to move apart by over a second.
They also proposed that we should hold off re-applying it for at least a century, allowing the two to become about a minute out of sync.
The decision on this upper limit, if any, will be finalised by 2026.
Representatives from the USA, Canada and France pushed for the change, although Russia voted against the proposal for the leap second’s removal in 2035.
The Russian satellite-navigation system, GLONASS, incorporates the leap second already, meaning significant technical changes will need to be made.
GPS, however, is run by the US military using atomic clocks, and effectively ignores the additional second.
The decision was made because this extra second can cause problems for digital systems that rely on a regular flow of time, like GPS and telecommunications (stock image)
On June 29 this year, the Earth reported its shortest day since records began, with 1.59 milliseconds shaved off the usual 24-hour spin.
This raised the prospect of a negative leap second having to occur to keep clocks aligned, which would be the first time in history that global clocks have been sped up.
This has ‘never been considered or tested’, according to documents from the CGPM, and supported the decision to scrap the leap second.
Scientists claimed climate change, seismic activity and ocean circulation could all be to blame for the faster rotation.
It could also have been the result of the pull of the moon and the so-called ‘Chandler Wobble’ – a change in the spin of the Earth on its axis.